Blog

6 design considerations for localized weld fume control

Shops have a few things to consider when designing a localized fume extraction system for welding. This includes knowing which welding technologies and materials it uses, fume exposure risks, filtration requirements, the mobility of welding operations, energy savings, and spark control.

Weld shops have lots of options when it comes to designing a localized fume extraction system for manual or robotic welding. Tailoring the system to the needs of welders and the production environment will help minimize costs and energy consumption while providing maximum protection for people. Here are six considerations for system design. Robotic Welding Steel

6 design considerations for localized weld fume control

The type of welding and the materials being used will have a big impact on the total volume of fume produced as well as its overall toxicity. In general, welding processes using consumables, such as gas metal arc welding, shielded metal arc welding, or flux-cored arc welding, will generate more fume than laser welding or resistance welding. Some materials are also more toxic than others; for example, welding stainless steel generates dangerous hexavalent chromium, while galvanized steel produces fumed zinc oxide.

Employers are responsible for ensuring that the weld fume collection system keeps worker exposure under the permissible exposure limits (PELs) set by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). The government agency has set a PEL for total weld fume concentration at 5 mg/m3 when welding mild steel, iron or aluminum, based on an eight-hour time-weighted average. However, PELs for specific elements found in weld fume, such as hexavalent chromium and lead oxides, are much lower. That means simply meeting the 5-mg/m3 standard for total weld fume is not enough.

Facility testing is a good place to start to help shops become familiar with the elements found in its weld fume and what its current exposures are.

A localized fume collection system starts with the hood or collection device. The hood must be designed to keep weld fumes out of the breathing zone of workers. For maximum energy efficiency and minimum weld fume exposure, collect weld fumes as close to the source as possible.

Robotic welding cells can be contained under a full hood. The hood should be designed to minimize the airflow required to collect weld fumes. No one should work inside the hood. Robotic tip extraction is an alternative for applications that cannot be easily hooded or for cobots working alongside people.

For manual welding, choose an option that keeps fumes out of the breathing zone. Fume guns can be a great choice for GMAW. With proper technique, they can remove 90% to 95% of generated fumes and minimize the airflow required for collection. If using a backdraft plenum or fume arm, make sure it is positioned to pull fumes up and away from the welder’s face.

For light-duty shops with occasional welding activity, a good ventilation system with localized fume capture may be sufficient. However, high-production shops almost always require a dust collection system. These systems capture and filter weld fumes before returning air to the facility or push it outdoors. An air filtration system keeps facilities compliant with EPA rules and other regulations for exhausting contaminants to the outdoors and saves energy by keeping heated or air-conditioned air inside the facility.

A cartridge-style dust collector is recommended for most welding applications. These collectors are highly energy efficient and provide more airflow in a smaller physical footprint than baghouse collectors. They also can be equipped with higher-efficiency air cartridge filters to collect submicron particles created by thermal processes like welding. For weld fume collection, a filter with a minimum efficiency reporting values (MERV) rating of at least 15 is recommended. It is also important to size the dust collector appropriately. It must provide enough airflow to maintain required capture velocities and have enough filter media (air-to-cloth ratio) for the volume of fumes collected.

The right type of dust collection system depends on how many welding stations there are, the configuration of the facility, how much mobility is required by individual welders, and how much flexibility is desired for future growth or reconfiguration.

A well-designed fume extraction system will help bring a facility into compliance, reduce energy use, and maximize employee comfort and safety.

There are several options to consider:

Designing an energy-efficient system starts with selecting the right dust collector. A correctly sized cartridge dust collector is usually the most energy-efficient option.

For additional energy savings, look for these features:

Most welding processes produce a lot of sparks. Those sparks can create a fire or combustion risk inside the dust collection system. Spark control is usually necessary at the inlet of the dust collector or ductwork to prevent sparks from reaching the filter chamber.

Some dust collectors are equipped with a mesh or screen-type spark trap. These are simple devices that block sparks from entering the inlet. They must be cleaned periodically to remove soot and particulate.

A centrifugal spark arrester can provide more protection for environments where a large number of sparks are produced near the dust collection system inlet. These systems use centrifugal force to drive sparks against the chamber walls and strip the thermal envelope.

Designing a localized weld fume collection system that is both effective and efficient can be complex. It is usually beneficial to work with a qualified engineering partner who can conduct facility testing before and after installation and help you make the best decisions for your operation. The right system will keep your facility in compliance, reduce energy use, and maximize the comfort and safety of employees.

The right system will depend on the number of welding stations, the configuration of the facility, how much mobility is required by individual welders, and how much flexibility will be required in the future.

Applications and Vent Mapping Engineer

See More by Kyle Billy

Read more from this issue

The Welder, formerly known as Practical Welding Today, is a showcase of the real people who make the products we use and work with every day. This magazine has served the welding community in North America well for more than 20 years.

Easily access valuable industry resources now with full access to the digital edition of The Fabricator.

Easily access valuable industry resources now with full access to the digital edition of The Welder.

Easily access valuable industry resources now with full access to the digital edition of The Tube and Pipe Journal.

Easily access valuable industry resources now with full access to the digital edition of The Fabricator en Español.

Emma Sauve of Mobsteel and Detroit Steel Wheel brings the energy as she joins host Dan Davis and...

© 2024 FMA Communications, Inc. All rights reserved.

6 design considerations for localized weld fume control

Soldering Station Not yet registered? Sign up